And of course, if the customer wants to keep the existing dish (1000.4 EA, or 1000+ (for international channels at 118) as possible examples) then a DPH42 switch is an option.
If the tech knows how to install one. Mine didn't
And of course, if the customer wants to keep the existing dish (1000.4 EA, or 1000+ (for international channels at 118) as possible examples) then a DPH42 switch is an option.
If the tech knows how to install one. Mine didn't
That's good to know. Thanks for posting.If the customer has a 1000.2 dish then usually an LNB swap is all that's required at the dish. Then the node must be swapped out to a hub and Joey 1's to Joey 2's.
There does need to be a better tuner solution or in between the super joey and hopper 3. Also, they really need to improve Wally reliability and general ZIP receiver stability as well.And so, they must consider "other options."
I can't imagine what or why you are suggesting here.The Super Joey was just more or less a patch between HWS and H3. What would be the point (especially financially) to introduce an "in-between" receiver of lesser capability than the H3? Now, you really have me scratching my head over your VIP (not ZIP) comment. With exception of the 922, they have truly been the stalwarts of dependency in the history of Dish. In fact there are some here that won't give up their VIPs until their hands are cold!There does need to be a better tuner solution or in between the super joey and hopper 3. Also, they really need to improve Wally reliability and general ZIP receiver stability as well.
Considering none of us hs seen one, it's all speculation...Isn't the new Hopper light version going to be nothing more than a version of the VIP 722 receiver, except with the hopper tiles and menus ? It will be a dual tuner like the 722 too.
Isn't the new Hopper light version going to be nothing more than a version of the VIP 722 receiver, except with the hopper tiles and menus ? It will be a dual tuner like the 722 too.
What would SSD gain you? It's not like they need it for the higher IO, the current hard drives sure seem to have enough.Hopefully they'll stay within the Hopper/Wally architecture; a dual tuner Wally with a built in DVR would be cool. Or better yet.. an SSD drive instead of an HDD![]()
What would SSD gain you? It's not like they need it for the higher IO, the current hard drives sure seem to have enough.
They can not keep up with DVR read/write. They would not last long.Far less of a fail rate
That's the reason they are skipped to begin with.They can not keep up with DVR read/write. They would not last long.
Not necessarily as the less expensive SSDs have a fairly high early mortality rate and as KAB and ChadT41 noted the constant writing and rewriting in a DVR environment can create wear issues with SSDs.Far less of a fail rate
With me, the Hopper 1 would shut off, without anyone touching the remote or shutting it off of Hopper/Joey. Complaining about it must have drove them crazy. The installer asked after telling me that he would have to change some cables, then asked me, along with changing the cable asked if I wanted the Hopper 3. I was very hesitant, because I did not want to have to pay a large fee, and then he talked to Dish, and they allowed it. I love it, and have no regrets!!!
What we were told is it's a dual tuner Hopper with a Joey. Seems pretty odd that 10/1 is creeping up and still nothing official yetIsn't the new Hopper light version going to be nothing more than a version of the VIP 722 receiver, except with the hopper tiles and menus ? It will be a dual tuner like the 722 too.
Limited time offer