Welcome!Satellite service is great. But have you ever wondered how many satellites are needed for all of us to receive these services? Who launches satellites? How often do these things need to be replaced? Can they be served?
I agree about wikipedia but I think they are a pretty safe source for things like galaxy19.Thanks for your reply. But you shouldn't trust Wikipedia lately. I also wonder how much the industry can change. For example, if inexpensive launches from any latitude and so on are possible.
The physical size of a satellite is largely dependent on its purpose. The cost of the launch fuel is a minor factor in the overall scheme of things. But the amount of fuel needed to keep a satellite in its assigned location for a given period of time is a big factor in the satellite size needed. For DBS, the size of the solar panels needed to power the electronics and the number of antenna arrays needed are also factors affecting the size. SpaceX launched 143 small satellites, many for use in relatively short term research projects. Satellites this size would have little application in the DBS industry. The many Starlink LEO satellites that SpaceX is currently launching, usually in batches of 60, are relatively quite small at about 500 lbs each with a limited ~5 year life compared to the "full-sized" sats used at much high elevations with a much longer life.I hope that technology will allow for smaller satellites. This is probably already happening. And this will allow more satellites to be launched in the same payload volume. Also, I think that new cheap fuel could help.
Here ya go, 60 birds at insertionallow more satellites to be launched in the same payload
I would only point out that certain low altitude high value satellites have indeed been serviced. Cases I can think of off the top of my head include Hubble and multiple space stations. Anybody remember Skylab?The only "service" they can receive in space are those things that can be controlled by radio command from the ground such as repositioning, software updates, etc.
The lower the latitude, the more free velocity you get.I also wonder how much the industry can change. For example, if inexpensive launches from any latitude and so on are possible.
Exactly right. I don't know of anybody who has launched an orbital satellite off one of the poles, for example. But a sea launch has both advantages and disadvantages. If the rocket can survive floating in the water, you literally don't even need a launch platform. But some sort of barge would fix that situation at the expense of time to move it where you want it.The space industry is constantly changing, but building and launching satellites is still an expensive business that doesn't readily lend itself to mobile locations.
Free energy! IIRC you get an extra 1000mph if launching eastward simly due to the spin of the earth.Launching the satelites from the equater gives them a fling effect to get into orbit.
I do. I was going there for summer camp but didn't have a ride. They said they could pick me up. They didn't. I always wondered what happened? Oh well...Anybody remember Skylab?
It seems that this name I could not remember in the previous post.Support Vox’s explanatory journalism Northrop Grumman is already servicing satelites. If you do a google search for northrop grumman servicing satelites. They have lots of contracts for building them. I guess you will need to do your own search as the address is to suport the news organization. There is all kinds of satelites bieing developed and made by Northrup Grumman. You will see I was not talking thru my hat!!!
And also a lot of bright lights, what with all those rocket plumesif all companies start launching satellites one at a time, then we can get a lot of noise and a lot of new CO2 emissions.
@ solarvic
Limited time offer