"Shares of Dish Network Corp. rose $1.99, or 6.3 percent, to $33.55. An analyst at Kaufman Brothers upgraded the satellite TV operator Wednesday, the day after the company said first-quarter profit rose 65 percent."
Well, one issue is that Dish Network only added 730K subscribers. In the same period last year, Dish Network added 890K subscribers. If Dish Network managed to add 890K in Q108, they'd have an almost non-existant profit, as the subscriber acquisition cost for those extra 160K would have been pretty large. DISH reported SAC as $709, so that cost would have been about $113.5 million. If that did happen, it would have been less profit than last year's first quarter...Geronimo said:Pretty much neglected in our discussion of the earnings call (which turned into yet another VOOM thread) was the fact that they did turna first quarter profit and exceeded a lot of expectations.
Well, one issue is that Dish Network only added 730K subscribers. In the same period last year, Dish Network added 890K subscribers. If Dish Network managed to add 890K in Q108, they'd have an almost non-existant profit, as the subscriber acquisition cost for those extra 160K would have been pretty large. DISH reported SAC as $709, so that cost would have been about $113.5 million. If that did happen, it would have been less profit than last year's first quarter...
Long story short, you are more profitable if you don't grow.
Well, one issue is that Dish Network only added 730K subscribers. In the same period last year, Dish Network added 890K subscribers. If Dish Network managed to add 890K in Q108, they'd have an almost non-existant profit, as the subscriber acquisition cost for those extra 160K would have been pretty large. DISH reported SAC as $709, so that cost would have been about $113.5 million. If that did happen, it would have been less profit than last year's first quarter...
Long story short, you are more profitable if you don't grow.
I am not saying that the lack of sub growth should not ahve been brought up. I am just saying that it si odd that we discuss Q1 earnings without even mentioning what the earnings were---and the fact that increased earnings may have gotten some attention elsewhere.
Limited time offer