This thread is intended to compile/summarize the various troubles with satellite 129 (AKA EchoStar 5) particularly when using a Dish 1000. Based on what i have _read_ in several different threads in this forum.,,
1) "129 is a dying bird" -
* 129's automagic orbital correction system is broken.
* 129 must regularly (frequently?) be 'manually' repositioned via thrusters.
* This can't go on much longer since it is running out of fuel.
2) When using Dish 1000, signal strength on 129 is often (usually?) much lower than on 110 & 119.
* 110 & 119 are frequently reported at 80-90, while 129 is at 40-50
* This can cause 129 to drop below lock threshold even when 110 & 119 or OK.
3) Some of 129's transponders produce "weak" signals.
* In particular, Tp 22 is "weak".
* This causes HGHD (9461) to be one of the poorest HD channels for reception.
For those using a Dish 1000, the bottom line is that the HD content (most of which is on 129) is the first to go in any poor reception scenario (e.g poor weather). And HGHD is the canary in the HD coal mine.
Please post corrections / additions.
Talon Dancer
PS the reported "solution" is to use a separate Dish 500 for 129 (or 61.5 if your locals are not on 129) until E* replaces "the dying bird".
EDIT: The solution in my case was to follow the suggestions in this thread to have my Dish 1000 re-aligned to get better reception on 129 (to the mid 70s). As it happens, this also improved the signal strength of 110 & 119 to above 100 on most transponders. So all of the satellites improved significantly
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread.
1) "129 is a dying bird" -
* 129's automagic orbital correction system is broken.
* 129 must regularly (frequently?) be 'manually' repositioned via thrusters.
* This can't go on much longer since it is running out of fuel.
2) When using Dish 1000, signal strength on 129 is often (usually?) much lower than on 110 & 119.
* 110 & 119 are frequently reported at 80-90, while 129 is at 40-50
* This can cause 129 to drop below lock threshold even when 110 & 119 or OK.
3) Some of 129's transponders produce "weak" signals.
* In particular, Tp 22 is "weak".
* This causes HGHD (9461) to be one of the poorest HD channels for reception.
For those using a Dish 1000, the bottom line is that the HD content (most of which is on 129) is the first to go in any poor reception scenario (e.g poor weather). And HGHD is the canary in the HD coal mine.
Please post corrections / additions.
Talon Dancer
PS the reported "solution" is to use a separate Dish 500 for 129 (or 61.5 if your locals are not on 129) until E* replaces "the dying bird".
EDIT: The solution in my case was to follow the suggestions in this thread to have my Dish 1000 re-aligned to get better reception on 129 (to the mid 70s). As it happens, this also improved the signal strength of 110 & 119 to above 100 on most transponders. So all of the satellites improved significantly

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread.
Last edited: