Divisions are needed because the conferences have too many teams to do a round robin or have the same schedule.I really have been thinking that they (everyone) should do away with Divisions .... (like what the Big 12 is doing)
Divisions are needed because the conferences have too many teams to do a round robin or have the same schedule.I really have been thinking that they (everyone) should do away with Divisions .... (like what the Big 12 is doing)
Not if LSU beats Georgia in the SEC Championship (very likely). At that point it'll be Alabama instead of Georgia (who would then have 2 losses).I think its gonna be Ohio State/ LSU (either way) and Clemson and ............. Georgia (because of the Love the sec gets) or Utah.
Because early rankings are crap.How can you not go by what they were rated at the time ?
Strength of schedule. LSU and Ohio St. have beaten better teams.Why isn't Clemson #1?
And thats ANOTHER issue ...had they not tried to make these SUPER Conferences a few years back, you wouldn't have that issue.Divisions are needed because the conferences have too many teams to do a round robin or have the same schedule.
Opps, I forgot, Penn State has 2 losses ...Not if LSU beats Georgia in the SEC Championship (very likely). At that point it'll be Alabama instead of Georgia (who would then have 2 losses).
The only way Georgia gets in is if they beat LSU.
Also, with 2 losses, there's no way Penn St. gets in.
Have you looked at how many ranked teams they have beat ... or played ?Why isn't Clemson #1?
I agree, but you have to go by SOMETHING, If you go by the Current ranking as in what they were when they played, at least they WERE ranked to be good enough at the time.Because early rankings are crap.
6-5 Texas, who was a Top 10 team at the beginning of the season, is a perfect example of that.
I have also not defended Alabama or Clempson's schedules this year, as neither team has beaten anyone.
Did you make two posts back to back? If so, it may have merged them together into one post.Have you looked at how many ranked teams they have beat ... or played ?
[automerge]1574803359[/automerge]
I agree, but you have to go by SOMETHING, If you go by the Current ranking as in what they were when they played, at least they WERE ranked to be good enough at the time.
I team could be great at the beginning of the season and stink by the end, they were still good in the beginning ...
Most teams are the opposite though.
[automerge]1574803408[/automerge]
Whats going on with these MERGED posts and why ?
When did THAT start ?Did you make two posts back to back? If so, it may have merged them together into one post.
I wasn't even sure it was a possibility, but I remember it being mentioned in the support thread about the upgrade. May want to mention it there.When did THAT start ?
2 posts back to back may be about 2 entirely different things.
I did mention it, just waiting to see if someone has a solution.I wasn't even sure it was a possibility, but I remember it being mentioned in the support thread about the upgrade. May want to mention it there.
Seeing I'm not Staff, I missed the info on it.Was mentioned in the staff section that it is indeed a feature that was just turned on recently.
If you want to know more though, Scott can explain it in the support section.
Scott fixed the Merge issue ....I did mention it, just waiting to see if someone has a solution.
[automerge]1574814449[/automerge]
Seeing I'm not Staff, I missed the info on it.
This is quite interesting ...CFP Rankings 11/26/19
1. Ohio State 11-0
2. LSU 11-0
3. Clemson 11-0
4. Georgia 10-1
5. Alabama 10-1
6. Utah 10-1
7. Oklahoma 10-1
8. Minnesota 10-1
9. Baylor 10-1
10. Penn State 9-2
11. Florida 9-2
12. Wisconsin 9-2
13. Michigan 9-2
14. Oregon 9-2
15. Auburn 8-3
16. Notre Dame 9-2
17. Iowa 8-3
18. Memphis 10-1
19. Cincinnati 10-1
20. Boise State 10-1
21. Oklahoma State 8-3
22. USC 8-4
23. Iowa State 7-4
24. Virginia Tech 8-3
25. Appalachian State 10-1
Lol that was terrible. Kicker still should have made the kick, but that killed it for them.
Not really.And thats ANOTHER issue ...had they not tried to make these SUPER Conferences a few years back, you wouldn't have that issue.
No, they weren't good. Pollsters thought they were good, and they were wrong.I team could be great at the beginning of the season and stink by the end, they were still good in the beginning ...
Most teams are the opposite though.
Limited time offer