Folks I just go a note from a HIGHLY trusted source informing me that CBS-HD E&W will be dropped tonight as well.
I have no confirmation of this.
I am making some calls now to see if I can get an answer.
Folks I just go a note from a HIGHLY trusted source informing me that CBS-HD E&W will be dropped tonight as well.
I have no confirmation of this.
I am making some calls now to see if I can get an answer.
Does anyone still have SD distants? Mine went poof at 2AM Eastern this morning.
Crap....Folks I just go a note from a HIGHLY trusted source informing me that CBS-HD E&W will be dropped tonight as well.
I have no confirmation of this.
I am making some calls now to see if I can get an answer.
Yes, this Judge did issue the permanent injunction but ONLY after the Court of Appeals ordered him to. In fact, gave him NO other option but the permanent injunction. The trial judge wanted strict requalification of E* DNS subs and that is why the networks and NAB appealed. Isn't this how it went down or did I miss something?By the way, this is going in front of the same judge that issued the injunction.
This is where your argument breaks down. E* is not transmitting the DNS nor is it receivng revenue from the transmission of DNS. The straw-man argument would be used if a shell company controlled by E* had been set up. E* is leasing transponder space to a third-party. That third-party without any connection to E* except for the transponder lease will be transmitting the DNS to their subscribers. These subscribers may or may not be E* subscribers. This is a legitimate business transaction and should be viewed by the Court as totally separate from the E* DNS injunction.
Limited time offer