I believe that is Dish Network's motto. It's printed right at the top of the monthly bill, isn't it?cableman2 said:just pay the sh*t and watch tv...jeesh.....
I believe that is Dish Network's motto. It's printed right at the top of the monthly bill, isn't it?cableman2 said:just pay the sh*t and watch tv...jeesh.....
griz_fan said:All those software patches for the 522 don't come cheap!
But, Dish's $5 per unit DVR fee is not better than DirecTivo's $5 per account DVR fee.tysonwetzel said:Dish's 4.98 DVR fee is still a better deal than Tivo's 12.99 fee.
Nor are they cheap for the non-DVR models. If Dish didn't provide updates our subscription rates would be lower. The DVR receivers are not necessarily getting more updates than the non-DVR models. Going back to the end of 2003 with the introduction of the 811 and 921, it's really a mixed bag. (See the EKB Receiver Software Versions chart, click on the versions.) The no-fee 811 and 322 are near the top of the list. I admit that quantity is an overly simplistic measure but it's interesting to note that a fee does not seem to result in more attention.griz_fan said:All those software patches for the 522 don't come cheap!
tysonwetzel said:think that since Dish can afford to give us free DVR's and free dishes and installation, they should also provide free services and programming. Er wait, maybe the charges for the services and programming are how a for profit business can give away free hardware and labor.
But Then look at cable who is going to charge you
Pepper said:The DVR fee is extremely simple: For each DVR-510, 522, 625, 921 or 942 active on the account, the fee is charged. Why? Because they can. There is no other logical or reasonable explanation.
- Does it have anything to do with DVR capability? No - Although all the receivers that have the fee are DVRs, the 501, 508 and 721 don't have the fee.
- Does it have anything to do with hard drive size? No - the 721 and 522 have same size drives)
- Is it to cover extended (Name-based-recording) or dual-tuner capabilities? No, and No - the 510 doesn't have either, the 721 and 921 don't have NBR, and the 501 and 508 most likely WILL have NBR if and when the 510 gets it.
- Is it to line the pockets of E* stockholders or to help cover expenses (software development or maybe to fund a future legal settlement with Tivo)? Most likely the real purpose of the fee is something in this category.
Some may argue the morality of charging a "because you can" fee, but to me it is worth it. It worked out to a wash for me because before I got the 522, I had two separate receivers with a $5 additional receiver fee on the second; now I only have the one with a $5 DVR fee.
* Note, none of this applies to the $10 Personal TV fee that is/was applied to the 7100/7200 DishPlayer units, part of it at least was for licensing fees to Microsoft for the software.
griz_fan (edited) said:First, Dish incurs a cost with developing and maintaining DVR functionality. All those software patches for the 522 don't come cheap! Also, Dish needs to recoup their expenses for basically giving away the hardware. Since DVR receivers have features above and beyond the basic functionality of receiving and displaying a satellite signal, Dish has decided to charge for that extra feature in the form of a monthly charge, as apposed to an up-front cost.
Simply put, there are costs for Dish to provide DVR functionality. There is also a demand for this feature. Since Dish is in business to make money, they will charge as much as they think they can get away with. If they overcharge, they'll loose customers to DirecTV or the local cable companies. Simple. Basic economic principles will keep pricing in line.
I spent $1000 for ONE 921 wth the promise of DishWire, I AM paying the DVR fee, and now I'm gonna be taking it up where the sun don't shine over the MPEG-4 conversion.I spent $1000+ for two 721's... (granted I'm not paying the DVR fee)
Limited time offer