Interesting question for us hardware buffs. I think they could convert a 301 into a 311 by swapping out the tuner module. If the form factor isn't identical already, I'll bet there are enough 301s out there to make a special run of 8PSK tuners that would be.I wonder if they have a way to cheaply convert an QPSK box to 8PSK?
IIRC, that was all soldered. Could that possibly be cost effective?
Don't most of the modern MPEG-2 receivers support 8PSK already? I thought I read something like that somewhere that Dish had this advantage over their competitor.
Bell could probably use a few.Anyone want to buy 10-20 million MPEG2 QPSK boxes?
3/25 Epoch
Perigee increased to 25109km and inclination is down to 2.8 degrees.
It took them one week to do what it took Direct months to do. One has to question if their are any costs to doing something so quickly? Sometimes it is better to do something right vs fast.
Not if you greatly diminish the life span by using too much fuelIt probably used more fuel to get it to its current position so quickly, but I don't think there is a right vs. fast argument here. It is either at its correct position or not. It can be both right and fast.
Not if you greatly diminish the life span by using too much fuel
Not if you greatly diminish the life span by using too much fuel
I don't know. That is why my point was in the form of a question in my first post and a conditional statement in my second. Comparing 2 months to 1 week, that is a huge difference.And how much fuel, pray tell, did they use? Did they GREATLY diminish the life span of the satellite? I doubt it.
Sometimes, when you're using the right hardware, it is OK to go fast.Sometimes it is better to do something right vs fast.
Limited time offer