Disney also needs to unlink the locals as well.ESPN needs to hurry up and figure this out, they shouldn't need a year. I think the only issue is they have to immediately offer the same package to all providers and most of them will probably move away from providing a total subscriber fee model.
The no-ads option (for Disney+ and Hulu) is $44.99 per month, so basically $25 extra.![]()
ESPN Streaming Service Sets $29.99 Price and Bundle With Disney+
The service will be called ESPN: "Simple, straightforward, clear," chief Jimmy Pitaro said Tuesday.www.hollywoodreporter.com
ESPN pulled back the curtain on its long-awaited direct-to-consumer streaming service Tuesday, planning a fall launch at $29.99 per month, or $35.99 for a bundle that will include Disney+ and Hulu.
The service, which will be called ESPN, will live inside a completely redesigned ESPN app.
I have often wondered why they don't offer that as a yearly bundle.Also, it is a mistake not to offer a discounted year long bundle for the no ads option like they are for the with ads version ($300), it would keep more people on the hook all year.
If DIsney+ would include the ABC local I could possibly break free of DIRECTV for good. That would make all 4 network locals available via streaming.The no-ads option (for Disney+ and Hulu) is $44.99 per month, so basically $25 extra.
It is the only way I might keep it all year.I have often wondered why they don't offer that as a yearly bundle.
Limited time offer