Seriously?I love it. Sturdy in the hand. Small learning curve. Fast. Clicky buttons.
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk
They give a tactile feedback, not audible clicks. At least that's my experience. It's a better method than pressing and hoping you pressed enough.Seriously?
yeah, I don't know that I can ever get used to "press-and-hold" for FF and BACK - the 40.0 buttons work so much better for me. I found myself constantly "over-shooting" with the new remote.In my experience, the press, or press-and-hold separate functions have always been a PITA for me (if you don't hold long enough, or press too long, you get a potential unintended action). That is a deal-breaker for me.
It seems to me that the new remote would be more difficult for the "newbie" - I find a lot of functions that seem less-than-obvious, but hey - that's just me.Seriously?
Did he initially say he needed to take the 40.0 remote(s), or was it a non-issue?I asked the tech to leave the old and he synced both to the Hopper 3 with no issue.
When I mentioned to my installer (Real Dish Network employed installer) that I wanted to sync my old 40.0 remote to the H3 to restore the timers and favorites list from my old HWS, he asked if I also wanted to keep the old remotes. I said that I would as long as he would not get in "trouble" for not collecting them. He said he could just check off "Remotes not available" and there would be no issues. While the 52.0 remotes are functional, I prefer the additional buttons and direct feature access of the 40.0. I don't understand why the 52.0 remote exists. It seems like a step backwards. It may be cheaper to build and generate cost saving for Dish? I suspect the lack of a DVD/BluRay control mode is at least partially due to the lack of buttons on the 52.0 remote.
Limited time offer