No...IF YOU HAD READ the posted article, the JUDGE is thinking of throwing out the evidence because....TA DAHHHH.....it might not be HIS urine sample....
No...IF YOU HAD READ the posted article, the JUDGE is thinking of throwing out the evidence because....TA DAHHHH.....it might not be HIS urine sample....
It's not that simple. The man who collected his blood and piss was also his personal trainer who is refusing to testify. The reason the evidence is probably going to be ruled inadmissible is NOT because "it might not be his urine"...it is because without a sponsoring witness (the trainer), the evidence is inadmissible hearsay.