Seems to be a flood of rumour, innuendo and opinion about what Charlie will or won't do with HD.
If we're to judge by what he (or another official spokesperson) actually said, then "HD not a driving force" seems to indicate his response to the bad economy and Dish's poor performance is to cut back on adding HD rather than aggressively competing with D*, FIOS, etc. on that front. There are people (and politicians) who think the way to improve the economy in general and their business in particular is to scale back expansion plans, pull in their horns and hope things get better. Charlie may be one of them. Good luck to him.
I did not see the speech or whatever in which Charlie made the alleged remark cited, and thus can't judge the context. In every Charlie Chat or Tech Forum in which the subject has been discussed for the last year or two, Charlie, Mark and the rest of the Dish gang have consistently discussed a significant expansion of HD, not contraction. Before AMC 14 was lost, Charlie had a very aggressive expansion of both national channels in HD and also HD locals set out.
The sad fact is Dish (and we Dish customers) are running 9 months behind on Charlie's original schedule, due to that one errant endeavor. Since the lead time in getting a new satellite put on order, designed, built, and launched is 2 to 3 years, that's approximately how long Dish will be playing catch-up. Not coincidentally, perhaps, that's about the lead Dish had on DirecTv in the rollout of a significant amount of HD, and now Dish is scrambling to just stay even in the race.
Best regards,
fitzie