Then they need to put the thread back to its original title, as it would be more accurate. "OLN dropped by dishnetwork??? ", because that is what happened.wicked said:lol it converted in a blame war lol
Then they need to put the thread back to its original title, as it would be more accurate. "OLN dropped by dishnetwork??? ", because that is what happened.wicked said:lol it converted in a blame war lol
-OLN is NOT asking for more money for this channel - all they are asking for is for it to be distributed in a package to a wider audience. Yes, in the long run, E* will have to pay a little more to OLN, since now more people will be seeing it, but in reality, E*'s costs would not go up that high proportionately, since typically the more subs you offer a channel to, the LOWER the provider's cost is to offer the service to begin with.
How do I know any of what? I presented two opposing scenerios. The truth is most likely one of them. My money is on OLN's.juan said:How do you know any of what you just posted?
TNGTony said:Where do you draw the line? Do you subscribe to every channel available on your system (I mean every one?) The answer is probably no. My question is Why not? Probably because at some point you said it costs too much. Your neighbor may not agree. So if your neighbor gets everything, why not you? Are you just being cheap?
As to the cost issue. By dropping a channel to a lower tier and being charged the same amount per subscriber LOWERS THE MARGIN ON THE PACKAGE. You have increased costs on that package. The company needs to either absorb the cost by lowering their margin or raise the price. There is no other alternative.
mwgiii said:dishrich,
Just curious why you are putting up such a fight since you have DirecTv?
mwgiii said:I wonder if this might explode into a holy war between Dish & Comcast and effect other channels?
Comcast's other channels:
E!
Style
The Golf Channel
OLN
G4
AZN TV (old International Channel)
riffjim4069 said:That was in 2002, but who knows what the future holds. Perhaps in the future it may be possible for both to share costly satellite and uplink facilities while still maintaining their own autonomy. Other than the technical limitations, I am not aware of any legal barriers preventing them from partnering should push ever come to shove in the video landscape.
ramy said:Who cares? Do many people watch those?
welllllllllllllllllllllll charlie is a big democrat...rupert is a very generous republican..the republicans rule the roost!!!!!guess what?? Rupert always get what he wantsBrewer4 said:Didnt the FCC already block Echostar and Directv from merging? I agree there will be consolidation but I think 2 dish companies will exist for a while. What I do see happening, is more News Corp/Directv ownership scenarios. Thats where it gets more interesting. Its the ownership of the content in question that will cause issues with providers. Thats what is going on with Comcrap pushing its weight on E*.
Comcast tried to buy them once and I think you will see someone vie for Disney/ESPN again. Let the games begin. Its gonna get more interesting than just OLN/Comcrap/E*.
BFG said:We'll see the playoffs
Like others have said OLN will be back and available to AT120
It's really just another chance for dish to get attention by the little show![]()
mdonnelly said:E* cheerleaders vs. E* bashers. I'm on the sidelines for this one. I watched 10 minutes of the TDF this year. I'll watch less hockey than that. And I do have AT180.
:haha I know. It seems that the people most outraged by E* not carrying OLN are the D* and cable subs.NightRyder said:Ditto here.
What I find interesting is how many non E* customers feel some bizarre need to take sides in this silly corporate dispute.
NightRyder
Limited time offer