And the NFL is going to punish Ben based on HIS confirmation of some of what the DA said. I am not calling him a rapist, but he's put himself into multiple bad situations due to poor judgement, that is why he will be punished.
Let's take these one at a time. How do you know HE is not lying? She immediately reported it to the police.
The did prosecute because they didn't have enough evidence to prosecute. And if you read the police report, there was, to me, enough to prosecute...but they didn't...WHY, listen to the DA and they come this short ---><--- from calling the local police department completely incompetent. AND it sounds like it was HIS legal counsel that went to her to strike a deal. But besides that, if you were to EVER ask any woman if she want the shame of going through a trial where ALL your personal business is out in the open, I am POSITIVE none wanna go through that. Do you know that only 1/3 of actual rapes get reported....ONE THIRD.
Going to your comparisons to Vick is apples and oranges. Ask any cop and they will tell you there are PLENTY of folks that are out on the street that they just don't have either enough proof to prosecute or the right proof to prosecute.
You are thinking with your heart.
Rey Lewis is a guy that lucked out. He MAY or MAY NOT been involved because they had absolutely no proof on him:
At the trial, the vast majority of testimony was either inconclusive or supported the defense's contention that Lewis acted solely as a peacemaker. ESPN legal analyst Alan J. Baverman said, "as to Ray Lewis, there is no evidence that he assisted anybody in a stabbing or encouraged anybody to do a stabbing which would make him a party to felony murder, malice murder, or felony assault with a knife
Ray Lewis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Believe me when I tell you NO ONE has forgiven him because that gets brough up down here ALL the time.
For perhaps the first time ever...I totally agree with this guy.
Suspending someone based on he said/she said is a very slippery slope. And if you're going to suspend a football player for being an idiot or a jerk, there will be a long line of players outside Goodell's office waiting for their suspension.
Sandra
:up:up:up:up:up:up:up:upFor perhaps the first time ever...I totally agree with this guy.
Suspending someone based on he said/she said is a very slippery slope. And if you're going to suspend a football player for being an idiot or a jerk, there will be a long line of players outside Goodell's office waiting for their suspension.
Sandra
I agree....but here is the thing. WE are basing our opinions on what we have seen as far as reports from the police department. But I am sure that Goodell will have the LEAGUE's PI doing some investigating too AND reports from both the DA AND the police department. They will have ALOT more info than what we have.
i think he should still be suspended for being such an idiot but agree with sandra that this will change the way future suspensions will be dealt with. its a slippery slope. either way, for putting the franchise under this very negative spot light twice is worthy of a suspension here.i don't think he will appealIf Ben feels at all wronged by or disagrees with whatever suspension he gets, he can always appeal....![]()
I don't think he will appeal either, hence the little winking guy.i think he should still be suspended for being such an idiot but agree with sandra that this will change the way future suspensions will be dealt with. its a slippery slope. either way, for putting the franchise under this very negative spot light twice is worthy of a suspension here.i don't think he will appeal
i think he should still be suspended for being such an idiot but agree with sandra that this will change the way future suspensions will be dealt with. its a slippery slope. either way, for putting the franchise under this very negative spot light twice is worthy of a suspension here.i don't think he will appeal
It's only a "slippery slope" if he was a first time offender. He's had multiple off the field incidents including but not limited to: drunken intoxication with photo's posted on the internet, motorcycle crashes and MULTIPLE sexual misconduct accusations.
i think he should still be suspended for being such an idiot but agree with sandra that this will change the way future suspensions will be dealt with. its a slippery slope. either way, for putting the franchise under this very negative spot light twice is worthy of a suspension here.i don't think he will appeal
i think he should still be suspended for being such an idiot but agree with sandra that this will change the way future suspensions will be dealt with. its a slippery slope. either way, for putting the franchise under this very negative spot light twice is worthy of a suspension here.i don't think he will appeal
It's only a "slippery slope" if he was a first time offender. He's had multiple off the field incidents including but not limited to: drunken intoxication with photo's posted on the internet, motorcycle crashes and MULTIPLE sexual misconduct accusations.
If this was a 1 time deal by Peyton Manning, I can see it being overlooked. The problem with Roethlisberger is that he's always in tabloids and this is not a good thing for the image of his team or the league.
Think about what we're saying here.
NFL players get drunkenly intoxicated (is there any other kind?) all the time. Unfortunately players get into crashes (and I do not believe he was drunkenly intoxicated at the time of that crash) all the time too...car, motorcycle, boat, Jet-ski, whatever. And anyone can be accused of something, but luckily this isn't Cuba or Iran...there is a burden of proof, which was not met according to the DA. I bet a lot more players fit the 'multiple incident' category here than you think.
And this is your personal 'line in the sand' anyway, not the league's. And you have to admit, if this was a Cleveland athlete your line in the sand may be a little different.
That's my whole point...a suspension here is VERY subjective.
Sandra
Limited time offer