rad said:Why does it take this long to get the SW2 turned over? E* just launched E10 a few weeks ago and I've seen threads that say that end or April they'll be lighting up channels on it. Just curious.
GeorgeLV said:Well maybe E* rushing things is why they've experienced more severe in-orbit failures than D*.
http://www.sat-index.com/failures/
GeorgeLV said:Well maybe E* rushing things is why they've experienced more severe in-orbit failures than D*.
http://www.sat-index.com/failures/
One thing to remember is that D* got the Spaceway sats from Hughes as part of the D* purchase. But one clause in the deal allows Hughes to use the birds for testing for 30 days. So even if Spaceway 2 is parked, Hughes gets to play with it for 30 days before D* gets it.riffjim4069 said:Wow! I'm surprised to see SW2 still in testing ...
herdfan said:One thing to remember is that D* got the Spaceway sats from Hughes as part of the D* purchase. But one clause in the deal allows Hughes to use the birds for testing for 30 days. So even if Spaceway 2 is parked, Hughes gets to play with it for 30 days before D* gets it.
Remember, Hughes has Spaceways 3 & 4, so they want to know what they can do.
vurbano said:Maybe it doesnt work
riffjim4069 said:I'm not trying to slam D* (I was really hoping they would be able to deliver by now), but their progress has been very disappointing...
I don't think it was quite as bad, but it did take quite a while to get parked. Maybe they want to save fuel and since there was no pressing need (for them, not usrad said:Or is SW2 having 'issues' like SW1 did?
herdfan said:I don't think it was quite as bad, but it did take quite a while to get parked. Maybe they want to save fuel and since there was no pressing need (for them, not us) to get it parked immediately, they took their time.
Limited time offer