The lawsuit that Dish filed against TiVo in Delaware has been transferred to Texas.Just saw this...
Is Dish filing a lawsuit against Tivo?
The lawsuit that Dish filed against TiVo in Delaware has been transferred to Texas.Just saw this...
Is Dish filing a lawsuit against Tivo?
First welcome back, I know it had been difficult for you,
jacmyoung said:just words of caution, try not to put words in my mouth again and provide some substances in the posts rather than constantly having personal issues, that will keep you around.
Uhh, what are you talking about "difficult for you." What was difficult for me? The decision? The one where I accurately predicted that the case would be transferred and you disagreed?
Oh, I see, you think I was gone because I was suspend or something. Hahaha. Sorry jac, hate to disappoint you, but I do have a life outside message boards. I highly suggest it.
Go to any electronics store and look at how many Tivo's are sitting around. People are using cable and satellite-based [digital video recorders]; they're cheaper, as easy to use, and are HD friendly. Digital transition in 2009 won't make much of a difference, if you've got a 25-year-old TV the last thing you're going to buy is a DVR.
...Judge: Judge T. John Ward
RFCExpress - Dish Network Corporation et al v. TiVo Inc.
Just noticed this one, why was this case not transferred to Judge Folsom?
The most compelling reason for the DE judge to transfer is Judge Folsom's experience in this litigation. Now Judge Ward will take over the new case?
Judge Ward has significant experience in determining damage awards after finding of contempt. Hmmmm. Makes one wonder.
Why couldn't Judge Folsom rule the new design still infringes, yet leave newer boxes to Judge Ward?...for the declaratory judgment case to move forward, Judge Folsom must not have ruled that the new design still infringes (hence E* is in contempt).
Why couldn't Judge Folsom rule the new design still infringes, yet leave newer boxes to Judge Ward?
Defendants in infringement cases should also not forget the utility of a declaratory judgment as a counterclaim. If a defendant brings a declaratory judgment counterclaim, plaintiff may not be able to so easily drop the suit if the outcome begins to look dismal. By bringing a counterclaim of non-infringement - as well as the affirmative defense - the defendant is assured that the issue of infringement, although perhaps not patent validity, will be resolved in the process. The fees expended on the defense are now guaranteed to be of value towards a final resolution with respect to infringement.
Patent owners should also be aware that a counterclaim of infringement is a compulsory counterclaim to a claim for declaratory judgment of non-infringement. c.f. Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng'g Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 802 (Fed. Cir. 1999). If a patent owner fails to assert an infringement counterclaim in a declaratory judgment non-infringement suit, the patent infringement claim will be deemed waived.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall inform this Court of any further attempt
to design around the '389 Patent and shall seek approval from this Court before any such design- around is implemented.
The next contempt hearing were be on the newer models. The chances are that they use the same infringed processes. Charlie would be throwing good money after bad.Looks like Dish will start a huge upgrade push for free to 622/722 campain right away. They have 30 days. I wonder how many of the infringing units are left. Some were already replaced with the Purple card update.
Looks like Dish will start a huge upgrade push for free to 622/722 campain right away. They have 30 days. I wonder how many of the infringing units are left. Some were already replaced with the Purple card update.
Limited time offer