MikeD-C05 Pub Member / Supporter Pub Member / Supporter Nov 25, 2003 37,087 41,161 Nederland , Texas Apr 17, 2006 #21 I thought 61.5 sat was hard to see in California because of elevation levels? 98 is a damn good signal for where your at.
I thought 61.5 sat was hard to see in California because of elevation levels? 98 is a damn good signal for where your at.
Tom Bombadil Supporting Founder Supporting Founder May 5, 2005 3,601 1 Chicago-Milwaukee Region Apr 18, 2006 #22 That Rainbow-1 bird they bought from VOOM seems to be of very high quality. Signals are strong and stable from pretty much the entire continental U.S.
That Rainbow-1 bird they bought from VOOM seems to be of very high quality. Signals are strong and stable from pretty much the entire continental U.S.
hdaddikt SatelliteGuys Pro Jul 2, 2005 278 0 Clovis, CA Apr 18, 2006 #23 MikeD-C05 said: I thought 61.5 sat was hard to see in California because of elevation levels? 98 is a damn good signal for where your at. Click to expand... Yes it is. And just a click above the horizon. Barring someone setting camp on the peak of Mt. Whitney, I should be ok. Last edited: Apr 19, 2006
MikeD-C05 said: I thought 61.5 sat was hard to see in California because of elevation levels? 98 is a damn good signal for where your at. Click to expand... Yes it is. And just a click above the horizon. Barring someone setting camp on the peak of Mt. Whitney, I should be ok.