That's different.
QPSK has one date point per quadrature transmitted.
16 QAM has 4 data points per quadrature.
64 QAM has 16 data points per quadrature.
Think of that as "data density" . 64 QAM has a lot more data per second than does QPSK, but it suffers badly from bad conditions in the field, like excessive distance, non line of sight, signal breakup issues, because all those data points are harder to control and get back in the correct sequence. If you DO find you can use it however, it yields a great amount of data, great shots of hi speed action ( where QPSK falls down, it doesn't contain the same data per second ) . It's a good encoding scheme for HD under well controlled circumstances, otherwise QPSK is used for it's greater robustness, even though there's less data throughput.
A good class that covers this and related subjects is telecast almost daily on 97W, PIT, the AZCAR test facility, 11779H 3979-3/4 . The class is for analog sat truck techs, upgrading to digital, and is very enlightening.
