They're not profitable. That is what is driving the merger.
They wouldhave been profitable 3 years ago if they didn't wildly overspend on programming trying to one up each other....
HOW much did XM pay for Oprah and MLB? HOW much did Sirius pay for Howard and the NFL?
Having no one else around to try and drive up prices will resolve that real quick....
I still feel that XM has deeper playlists while Sirius plays the same depth you can find on most radio stations (specialty formats like Heavy Metal excluded). I also have both services.
As far as I know they are profitable, it will be up to them to provide a product that compete with free services. As long as sports subscriptions exist in their current form they will forever be viable assuming they don't price themselves out of the market.
Hybrid MP3/internet/phone devices offering sports packages would be the biggest threat to probably their most ironclad niche.
No offense but most of the stuff I hear on sirius I rarely heard on terestrial such as B sides and studio cuts or live foreign tracks.
Neither company is profitable to date.
Limited time offer