Disney also needs to unlink the locals as well.ESPN needs to hurry up and figure this out, they shouldn't need a year. I think the only issue is they have to immediately offer the same package to all providers and most of them will probably move away from providing a total subscriber fee model.
The no-ads option (for Disney+ and Hulu) is $44.99 per month, so basically $25 extra.![]()
ESPN Streaming Service Sets $29.99 Price and Bundle With Disney+
The service will be called ESPN: "Simple, straightforward, clear," chief Jimmy Pitaro said Tuesday.www.hollywoodreporter.com
ESPN pulled back the curtain on its long-awaited direct-to-consumer streaming service Tuesday, planning a fall launch at $29.99 per month, or $35.99 for a bundle that will include Disney+ and Hulu.
The service, which will be called ESPN, will live inside a completely redesigned ESPN app.
I have often wondered why they don't offer that as a yearly bundle.Also, it is a mistake not to offer a discounted year long bundle for the no ads option like they are for the with ads version ($300), it would keep more people on the hook all year.
If DIsney+ would include the ABC local I could possibly break free of DIRECTV for good. That would make all 4 network locals available via streaming.The no-ads option (for Disney+ and Hulu) is $44.99 per month, so basically $25 extra.
It is the only way I might keep it all year.I have often wondered why they don't offer that as a yearly bundle.
my only guess is sticker shock and optics of offering anything to consumers for that price. if no ad bundle is $45/mo, offering yearly for $450 would probably be met with derision (because let's be honest, american consumers are dumb)I have often wondered why they don't offer that as a yearly bundle.
Disney+ does not offer discounted yearly plans for any of their bundles. In my case I was wondering why my bundle of Disney+ & Hulu has no yearly option. It is $19.99 per month. That works out to $239.88 per year. I assume they don't offer a yearly discounted option because if they do people would expect a discount off of that $239.88 and Disney doesn't want to come down on that price.my only guess is sticker shock and optics of offering anything to consumers for that price. if no ad bundle is $45/mo, offering yearly for $450 would probably be met with derision (because let's be honest, american consumers are dumb)
Limited time offer