Bill Gates is for the most part a genius when it comes to technology, but I don't like how he favors world government.I'm happy for you but your opinions are not representative of a big portion of the world.
BTW, No is more evil than Bill Gates with his politics
your hatred for Jobs is irrationalWhat Linux forum are you talking about?
What exactly does 'you foster the computer wars all day long' mean?
Hint: Not everyone worships the blades of grass Jobs has walked on or wants to be submissive to a suppressive ecosystem.
The way he treated is own daughter speaks volumes for what kind of POS he was.your hatred for Jobs is irrational
The same could be said of Bill Gates or Elon Musk.The worship he receives is what is truly irrational.
So, she’s basically happy with an iPod touch… The iPhone 6 was the last iPhone I could easily take apart, now the screens are sealed for water ingress protection.My sis still uses her iPhone 4S. T-Mobile shut off her 3G service, and she didn't even notice! The Nokia has 5G radio. The warranty has now expired on the 4S and she's still using her iPhone.
Both Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are/were jerks, but I love how they advanced technology over the decades.The way he treated is own daughter speaks volumes for what kind of POS he was.
The worship he receives is what is truly irrational.
You still haven't answered my questions:
What Linux forum are you talking about?
What exactly does 'you foster the computer wars all day long' mean?
I believe she still has texting and voice support. But if she doesn't, she knows what to do which is to move her SIM card over.So, she’s basically happy with an iPod touch…
Horsefeathers!Both Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are/were jerks, but I love how they advanced technology over the decades.
I'm going to guess that you weren't much involved in the computer world in the early days of the IBM PC because what you're saying doesn't make a lot of sense in that context. Back in the early 1980s, IBM PCs were stupid expensive and the user experience was vastly inferior to those presented by the Kaypro, Sol, Eagle, Apple ][, Commodore 64 and Atari computers of the day. What Bill Gates produced (with perhaps a majority effort from Paul Allen) was a version of the BASIC programming language (that was also present in one form or another in all of the 8 bit computers of the day). PC/MS-DOS was a re-tooling of Seattle Computing's Seattle DOS that Gates had strong-armed. If you're looking for someone to thank for affordable alternatives, you would be better served by calling out Compaq and Columbia Data Products.Gates? Yes. All the way. He brought the IBM platform into the reach of the everyday guy who wanted to build and have a computer that didn't cost a horse full of feathers.
Computers aren't about peddlers or service technicians making a buck. Computers are supposed to make things better for those who use them.It was and still is a lucrative business for the pc parts guy selling components to make a killer pc.
It seems you're also lost at sea in terms of your knowledge of the current state of non-Microsoft platforms.I have no complaints of the MS operating systems. No matter what all of the "Oh but Linux is so much better" soap box standers say. I don't wanna learn how to grow trees, run a sawmill, forge nails, float glass.....all of that crap just to live in a house.
Hooyeah I was. In the 70's when my dad was in the USAF and we were stationed in Athens. I took a BASIC programming class. Typing programs on a Teletype 33 ASR on paper tape. Then the teacher would proof the program before we were allowed to connect to the time share to run them. The next class would have been FORTRAN. I never got to see the mainframe. But it was cool to learn.I'm going to guess that you weren't much involved in the computer world in the early days of the IBM PC because what you're saying doesn't make a lot of sense in that context. Back in the early 1980s, IBM PCs were stupid expensive and the user experience was vastly inferior to those presented by the Kaypro, Sol, Eagle, Apple ][, Commodore 64 and Atari computers of the day. What Bill Gates produced (with perhaps a majority effort from Paul Allen) was a version of the BASIC programming language (that was also present in one form or another in all of the 8 bit computers of the day). PC/MS-DOS was a re-tooling of Seattle Computing's Seattle DOS that Gates had strong-armed. If you're looking for someone to thank for affordable alternatives, you would be better served by calling out Compaq and Columbia Data Products.
ZOOOM (right over harsh-style's cranial cavity).Computers aren't about peddlers or service technicians making a buck. Computers are supposed to make things better for those who use them.
It seems you're also lost at sea in terms of your knowledge of the current state of non-Microsoft platforms.
It would have had it not appeared that you have completely forgotten what those other platforms were like in comparison the early IBM PCs. Early IBM PCs were more like glorified CP/M machines of the day without the library of software.That should loosen up your brain cage a touch.
An this is a happy thing?IBM PC's of the day WERE stupid expensive. And with the tech advances of the day, your brand spankin' new 486 was soon made a snail by the Pentium Processor splashed all over the TV. And so on and so on.
I've loaded PDP/8 BASIC in using switch registers and paper tape so I do know all about that. My first business-class hard drives were 5MB CDC Hawks (both fixed and cartridge) connected to a machine based on a two-board CPU in an S100 frame (Alpha Micro AM-100).But. You aint livin' until you sat by a VMS system eating your lunch while it booted up....if it did the first try.
Or performed a weekend of software updates with tape cartridges with your fingers crosssed hoping to not see "Invalid Checksum. Please reload updates".
Your choices on the early IBM PCs were PC-DOS and MS-DOS. Not really a choice. At issue is why Microsoft's products prevailed (and it rarely had anything to do with goodness or suitability to the task).ZOOOM (right over harsh-style's cranial cavity).
Computers DID become a lot about being affordable and the ability to assemble one and load an OS somewhat of your choice. With Bill G's incantation being the winner usually.
This is where the value crept in. Of course many of these machines were a little "wonky" and may not run 1-2-3 or Flight Simulator as well as a true blue IBM PC. While you had to go to a computer store to even see a PC compatible, you could buy a Commodore or Atari 8-bit at Sears or Monkey Wards. Computers need to be both affordable and available to be of real benefit to the masses.For TONS less than the comparable CompUSA IBM PC or Dell of the day. Packard Bell, Compaq. Take your pick.
Again, why is financially supporting a technician important to the typical user? I suspect you have conflicting interests.If you think cars are all about the driving experience. And the smile (or of late...frown) per mile. Well, you're vastly missing something. The dealer is counting on you coming back for service. If Jimmy's Garage can do an oil change for 30-50% of what the dealer charges. Hey. It's your cash.
But you may be the guy who is making bank off of fixing computers.Do I care about the state of any platform computer related? Nah. Not really.
Remember. I ain't the dude who planted the seedling to grow trees for lumber nor did I mine ore to make nails.
Okidata printer ribbon cartridges were cheap and the could last more than a year (more if you were into re-inking). Ink and toner cartridges are relatively expensive and they have more or less a fixed life.Ink ink ink. People buy ink. Then they buy ink to replace the ink that dried up. And when that don't work.
They buy another printer that uses.....you guessed it. Ink.
Tons better than the old Okidata impact line printer.
The Apple LaserWriter was more or less a rebranding the HP LaserJet of the day (using a CANON LASER engine) with an ADB port. Yes, the logo cost alot but Jobs certainly didn't invent the LASER printer. As much as the Macintosh appeared unique, it wasn't a huge improvement over Xerox's Alto, GEOS or GEM operating systems of the day.So there is one...just one for good 'ole Steve when he introduced Laser Xeorgraphy to the masses.....of Apple users. Before the days if "i-everything".
I got some time. Backards/Forards......It would have had it not appeared that you have completely forgotten what those other platforms were like in comparison the early IBM PCs. Early IBM PCs were more like glorified CP/M machines of the day without the library of software.
An this is a happy thing?
I've loaded PDP/8 BASIC in using switch registers and paper tape so I do know all about that. My first business-class hard drives were 5MB CDC Hawks (both fixed and cartridge) connected to a machine based on a two-board CPU in an S100 frame (Alpha Micro AM-100).
Your choices on the early IBM PCs were PC-DOS and MS-DOS. Not really a choice. At issue is why Microsoft's products prevailed (and it rarely had anything to do with goodness or suitability to the task).
This is where the value crept in. Of course many of these machines were a little "wonky" and may not run 1-2-3 or Flight Simulator as well as a true blue IBM PC. While you had to go to a computer store to even see a PC compatible, you could buy a Commodore or Atari 8-bit at Sears or Monkey Wards. Computers need to be both affordable and available to be of real benefit to the masses.
Again, why is financially supporting a technician important to the typical user? I suspect you have conflicting interests.
But you may be the guy who is making bank off of fixing computers.
Okidata printer ribbon cartridges were cheap and the could last more than a year (more if you were into re-inking). Ink and toner cartridges are relatively expensive and they have more or less a fixed life.
The Apple LaserWriter was more or less a rebranding the HP LaserJet of the day (using a CANON LASER engine) with an ADB port. Yes, the logo cost alot but Jobs certainly didn't invent the LASER printer. As much as the Macintosh appeared unique, it wasn't a huge improvement over Xerox's Alto, GEOS or GEM operating systems of the day.
In all of this bluster, you still haven't answered the question: why do you think that Gates or Jobs were instrumental in advancing technology as fast as it could have gone and bringing computing to the masses. It seems to me that you've carefully avoided the issue that you raised.
Yet in all that bloviation, you haven't effectively defended your claim.3 bases covered......
Limited time offer